Here's more from the AB reasoning in Renewable Energy/Feed-In Tariffs: 5.174. In the present disputes, supply-side factors suggest that windpower and solar PV producers of electricity cannot compete with other electricity producers because of differences in cost structures and operating costs and characteristics. Windpower

THE ACADEMY OF INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT AND TRADE LAW 2013 Macau Cultural Centre 8th – 18th July 2013 Objectives: The Academy of International Investment and Trade Law, based in Macau and organized by the Institute of European Studies of Macau since, aims at providing education and training at the highest international standard

I'll be blogging more in the coming days about the exciting possibilities opened up by Roberto Azevedo's ascent to the leadership of the WTO.  This doesn't mean that I have forgotten the procedural corruption that led to the elimination of the African candidates in

I'm still puzzling over the Appellate Body's reasoning on "benefit" under SCM Agreement Article 1.1(b) in the Renewable Energy/Feed-In Tariff case, mentioned in the last post (Luca Rubini is doing the same thing in his comment to the post).  Very

The AB report in Canada - Renewable Energy/Feed-In Tariffs has been circulated.  There's a lot to digest in the reasoning on "benefit," and I've only just skimmed it, but my impression is that they have tried to provide some flexibility under the SCM

Thanks again to Rob for all of his posts on the Seal Products hearing. Maybe some day WTO hearings will get press coverage that is as extensive as U.S. Supreme Court hearings, but for now that is not the case, so it was nice to have access to Rob&

From the WTO web site: Cuba notified the WTO Secretariat, on 3 May 2013, of a request for consultations with Australia on the Australian Tobacco Plain Packaging Act of 2011 that regulates the appearance and form of retail packaging used in connection with sales of cigars, cigarettes and other tobacco

A few further observations. Some of the panelists had difficulty understanding how permitting for-profit or fully commercial sealing under the indigenous or marine management exceptions would undermine the public morals or animal welfare objectives of the EU.  I find this baffling:  it is very easy to see why people

Returning to New York City, some of the darkness lifts.  Good to read that Delaware's senate, following New York's the week before the Seals hearings, has passed a shark's fin ban.  This evening, at NYU law, we host John Ruggie, speaking about his new

It is easy to be depressed and disgruntled after this hearing.  A panel Chair who is ignorant even of the most basic case law fundamental to the panel's own duties and jurisdiction, a Chair who manages to make a sexual and racial caricature in one breath, then a