From the ASIL-IEcLIG: Elizabeth Trujillo from Suffolk University Law School and Jason Yackee from University of Wisconsin School of Law have been elected to be Co-Chairs of the International Economic Law Interest Group for ASIL.   Jason and Elizabeth are stepping in after 2 years as being Co-Vice

One last post on the Eli Lilly NAFTA Chapter 11 complaint (unless someone else has something they want to add).  Eli Lilly's national treatment argument is as follows: 106.  The  measures in  issue  de facto  discriminate  against Lilly,  a  U.S. investor,  when compared to domestic investors, by

In the last post, Henning provided an excellent summary of the key substantive parts of the Eli Lilly NAFTA Chapter 11 complaint as it relates to IP law.  Let me just make a more general point here (and another more specific point in the next post). In Eli Lilly'

A Guest Post by Henning Grosse Ruse - Khan: Last week, Luke Peterson reported that the U.S. based pharma corporation Eli Lilly has put Canada on notice of its intent to submit a claim to arbitration under NAFTA Chapter 11 following the invalidation of some of its patents by Canadian

Brazil has put forward a conceptual note (Word doc) on the issue of exchange-rate misalignment.  Its focus is on developing trade remedy procedures to deal with the perceived problem: IV. IS THERE A NEED TO CRAFT TRADE REMEDIES THAT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS CURRENCY MISALIGNMENTS? Existing provisions related to exchange-rate

I've talked about sub-federal state subsidies before on this blog. The issue is suddenly in the news, due to a long NY Times article today. CFR's Edward Alden proposes reining them in as follows: ... There are three basic requirements: a legislative framework, an adjudication body,

That's the title of a short essay of mine in the Virginia Journal of International Law's online edition.  Here's the main proposal: ... I thus propose an approach that I call "unilateral reciprocal binding trade liberalization." The basic idea is that unilateral liberalization

There have been a number of news reports about the WTO panel report in the Ontario feed-in tariffs case, brought by Japan and the EU.  The report has been issued to the parties, and may be circulated to the public some time in the next month or so.  If

GATT Article XXIII:1 sets out the following types of complaints: If any contracting party should consider that any benefit accruing to it directly or indirectly under this Agreement is being nullified or impaired or that the attainment of any objective of the Agreement is being impeded as the result

I don't hear much talk in the U.S. (or around the world for that matter) these days about climate change in general, much less taking any action to deal with it.  But some day the world economy might pick up, and perhaps then we will get back