Apparently, I am going to have to learn a bit more about H-1B visas. They are the subject of a new Indian WTO complaint against the U.S., which I may have something to say about next week. And they came up in last night's Republican presidential

Here is a recent @Trade_EU tweet: "CETA has a fast track system for rejecting unfounded or frivolous investment protection claims – in a matter of weeks!" The CETA provisions they are referring to are the following: Article 8.32 Claims manifestly without legal merit 1. The respondent may,

This is from an article on the EU regulation of certain pesticides, in the latest issue of the Economist: MORE herbicides contain glyphosate, a weedkilling chemical, than any other agent. Monsanto, an agricultural giant, first sold Roundup, a product containing the stuff, to farmers in the 1970s. Since then use

Back in the 1990s, I remember enjoying Paul Krugman's writings about trade policy and globalization.  But now he writes things like this: After all, doesn’t everyone know that protectionism causes recessions? Actually, no. There are reasons to be against protectionism, but that’s not one of them.

This is from Article 8.28, para. 2 of CETA: 2. The Appellate Tribunal may uphold, modify or reverse a Tribunal's award based on: (a) errors in the application or interpretation of applicable law; (b) manifest errors in the appreciation of the facts, including the appreciation of relevant

Todd Weiler is worried that the EU proposals for an investment court -- now in both the (yet-to-be-ratified) CETA and EU-Viet Nam FTA -- could lead to restrictive interpretations that make it too hard to win cases: The changes could lead to a tribunal that is seldom used,

Here is what @Trade_EU posted on twitter to help illustrate the new CETA ISDS: Not surprisingly, this graphic is getting rave reviews on twitter! I've seen (or offered myself) comments on the canoe, the bunny rabbits, the raccoon hat, the squirrel, the mustachioed Canadian who looks like

In the EU proposal for an investment chapter in TTIP, there is a provision on the "right to regulate" that seemed confusing to me, and certainly not as strong as a real exception.  At the same time, some people apparently worried it was too strong. It looks like

Apparently, Canada has agreed to amend the CETA investment provisions, to include the EU's new investment court. Here is the EU summary of the changes: Background The most important elements of the revised CETA investment chapter are the following: Investment protection The revised CETA text includes a new