When I hear people claim that ISDS/investment protection "de-politicizes" investment disputes, in the sense that governments can avoid the unpleasant task of espousing diplomatic claims against other governments, I usually respond by pointing out that ISDS claims create political controversy of another kind, so at best

Here is the link to the March 15 podcast by Tim Meyer, Jeff Rosen, and discussing the issue of whether Section 232 violates the US Constitution. https://constitutioncenter.org/debate/podcasts/trump-tariffs-and-trade

This is from the NY Times: The contentious negotiations over the fate of the North American Free Trade Agreement have veered into one of the world’s most pressing health issues: fighting obesity. Urged on by big American food and soft-drink companies, the Trump administration is using the trade

The U.S. submissions in the Russia - Traffic in Transit case are now available here. Here's an excerpt from the third party oral statement: III. The Text of Article XXI, in its Context, Establishes That the Exception Is Self-Judging 11. Article XXI of the GATT 1994, in

A clarification of the scope of the GATT Article XXI security exception may come sooner than expected, as Russia has invoked Article XXI(b)(iii) in the Russia - Traffic in Transit (DS512) dispute. The EU's third party submissions are now online: Third party written submission and third party

In my last post, I highlighted the comments of John Leddy, a U.S. delegate to the GATT negotiations, on the meaning and scope of the GATT security exception. But you probably noticed that the version under discussion as part of the New York draft does not have the crucial

In the New York draft of the GATT, the security exception was in Article 37, and was combined with the exceptions that are now part of GATT Article XX. Here's what the security exception looked like in this draft: SECTION H. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS Article 37 General exceptions to

EU Can Retaliate Immediately Against Trump's Metal Tariffs Steve Charnovitz 9 March 2018 In a recent post about the Trump Administration's proposed Section 232 actions against steel and aluminum, Simon Lester comments that "I'm not convinced by the argument that because the national

Presidential proclamations here and here. Canada and Mexico exempt for now. Here is the situation for other countries (from the steel proclamation): 9.  In adopting this tariff, I recognize that our Nation has important security relationships with some countries whose exports of steel articles to the United States weaken our