This is from the Centre for Trade and Investment Law in New Delhi, India: Request for Proposals: Training session and capacity building in the field of international trade and economic diplomacy. The Centre for Trade and Investment Law, established by the Ministry of Commerce, Govt. of India, is inviting proposals

The Department of Private International Law of the University of Szeged and the HAS-Szeged Federal Markets "Momentum" Research Group cordially invites you to: "National sovereignty and regional economic integration: non-trade values and international trade", on  May 3, 2018. The event will take place at:

There are reports that an "agreement in principle" on a new NAFTA is almost ready. Will they try to resolve all of the major points as part of this, or will they gloss over some of them? I'm not sure. Anyway, here are 13 issues I&

This is from the newly released text of the EU - Japan Economic Partnership Agreement: ARTICLE 21.25 Administration of the dispute settlement procedure 1. Each Party shall: (a) designate an office which shall be responsible for the administration of the dispute settlement procedure under this Chapter; (b) be responsible for

Last week, I posted about the EU splitting up its trade and investment agreements, with the EU - Singapore agreements separated out into a trade part and an investment protection apart. But it seems that the EU is taking a different approach in its updated, and almost completed, agreement with Mexico.

Today, the Canadian Supreme Court decided the Comeau case, involving provincial barriers on trade in beer. This decision could have created a Canadian "single market" (to borrow a phrase), but the justices decided on a narrower approach. For anyone who follows WTO jurisprudence or debates about policy space/

The legal texts of the EU - Singapore Free Trade Agreement and the EU - Singapore Investment Protection Agreement are now available here. A European Commission press release related to these agreements, and also covering the EU - Japan Economic Partnership Agreement, explains the next steps as follows: The Commission today presented the

China already made the argument that the Section 232 steel/aluminum tariffs are actually safeguard measures, both in a Safeguards Agreement consultations request and a DSU consultations request. Now both the EU and India have filed Safeguards Agreement consultations requests based on this same argument. The EU says the following

This is from Krzysztof Pelc's review of Dani Rodrik's new book: In the case of trade, one such wrinkle, long overlooked, comes from economic models’ focus on the “average citizen.” And while trade agreements may indeed be beneficial to the “average Canadian,” no such animal exists

Is it worth responding to things President Trump says about trade? I'm not sure, but I'm doing it anyway, very briefly. The transcript of his remarks from today is here. Feel free to add your own comments. Trump: THE PRESIDENT:  As you are all aware, China