Sometimes I blog about the most important issues of the day. Other times, I look for obscure issues that will be of interest to, at most, 4 or 5 people. This is one of the latter. This is from the interim review section of the Russia - Railway Equipment panel report:

Canadian negotiators are meeting with U.S. negotiators today, to see if they can build on the U.S. - Mexico deal and finalize a new NAFTA. One key issue will be Chapter 19: The U.S. wants it out, while the Canadians want to keep it. Here's something

So much happened in the trade policy world today. I'm going to mention four things. These are probably not the most important four, but they are the four that piqued my interest enough to blog about them. 1. In NAFTA, it looks like the sunset clause -- automatic expiration

This is from Bloomberg: While a U.S. proposal to increase tariffs on cars imported from Mexico that don’t meet stricter new content rules was a sticking point as recently as last week, that issue appeared to be resolved by Thursday. The U.S. agreed to keep the 2.

This is a guest post from trade lawyer Adarsh Ramanujan In this part, I will cover the point where the Complainants went wrong, regarding Article 16.1. This provision states – “The owner of a registered trademark shall have the exclusive right to prevent all third parties not having the owner’

This is a guest post from trade lawyer Adarsh Ramanujan As a practitioner in international trade law, I have always loved the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) Reports (the Appellate Body Reports more than the Panel Reports, to be honest). They are structured and well-written, though unnecessarily lengthy at

This is a guest post from Bashar H. Malkawi, Dean and Professor of Law, University of Sharjah In recent years, national movements against globalization and free trade have reached a critical mass and have resulted in the election of new political leaders who want to stop or even reverse globalization

Brett Fortnam of Inside U.S. Trade reports the following: The U.S. and Mexico have agreed to subject autos that do not meet a modernized North American Free Trade Agreement rule of origin to a 2.5 percent tariff if they are made at an existing manufacturing facility, industry

In Indonesia—Safeguards, as Simon has pointed out, the AB had an opportunity to consider the definition of “safeguard” for purposes of Article XIX of GATT and Article 1 of the Safeguards Agreement.  (Note also the interesting discussion begun by Steve Charnovitz on this issue.) Indonesia had imposed a specific

This is from today's Indonesia - Iron or Steel Safeguards Appellate Body report: 5.60. In light of the above, we consider that, in order to constitute one of the "measures provided for in Article XIX", a measure must present certain constituent features, absent which it could