International Economic Law and Policy Blog (Page 13)

International Economic Law and Policy Blog

Sign in Subscribe

The Second MPIA Appeal

The second appeal of a WTO panel report to the MPIA is underway in the China - IPRs Enforcement (EU) dispute (DS611). It will be interesting to see what approach the arbitrators take in terms of their scrutiny of the panel report. On the fairly technical IP issues that were

More on Charming Betsy

In my last post, I raised the possibility that Charming Betsy could play a role in the challenges to the Trump administration's IEEPA tariffs. (There have been three new complaints filed since that post: State of Oregon v. Trump, Learning Resources v. Trump, and Princess Awesome v. CBP.

The IEEPA Lawsuits and Charming Betsy

By my count, so far there have been five lawsuits filed in U.S. court related to either the IEEPA fentanyl tariffs or the IEEPA "reciprocal"/universal tariffs: - Barnes v. U.S., CIT (complaint) (fentanyl tariffs) - Emily Ley Paper v. Trump, U.S. district court, N.

Dark Globalization: Authoritarian Arbitrage in the Case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia

One dimension of the current case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia concerns the dark side of globalization: arbitrage by authoritarians to subvert constitutional and human rights protections. Abrego Garcia has been strategically disenfranchised through jurisdictional arbitrage implemented by physical transfer to El Salvador. If he remained in the U.S., he

Questions About the Upcoming Trade Deals

There have been a lot of U.S. tariffs in recent months, and it's getting hard to keep track of them all. This post deals with the IEEPA "reciprocal tariffs" announced on April 2, rather than the earlier IEEPA fentanyl tariffs or the various Section 232

Stephen Miran on the U.S. Providing Global Public Goods

Last week, Stephen Miran, the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, gave a speech at the Hudson Institute in which he explained that the U.S. deserved compensation for certain "global public goods" it provides to the world. In his opening remarks, he identified two such public

Guest Post: Japan Signals a Possible Shift Away from the WTO Dispute Settlement System in Response to U.S. “Reciprocal Tariffs”

This is a guest post from Yoshimichi Ishikawa, Associate Professor, University of Shizuoka, Japan For decades, Japan has adhered to the principle that trade disputes should be addressed strictly within the WTO dispute settlement framework. This long-standing position may now be facing a turning point. On April 2, 2025, the

Andrew P. Vance Memorial Writing Competition Call for Papers

This is from the Customs and International Trade Bar Association (CITBA) and Georgetown Law School The Customs and International Trade Bar Association (CITBA) and Georgetown Law School are pleased to announce 2024-2025 Andrew P. Vance Memorial writing Competition. The competition is welcoming papers with an in-depth analysis of a current

Guest Post: How to (legally) respond to the ‘reciprocal’ tariffs announced by the Trump administration?

This is a guest post from Antoine Comont, Ph.D Candidate at Laval University and the University of Bordeaux If respecting international law is a virtue that still makes sense to you, the question for each of the countries affected by the tariffs announced yesterday by the administration is how

Collective Economic Security

Collective Economic Security By Mona Paulsen (LSE Law) and Dan Ciuriak (C.D. Howe (Senior Fellow)) With a flurry of pomp and circumstance, the second Trump administration has reset United States trade with its trading partners. Based on U.S. laws that afford wide Executive discretion towards trade actions owing