Writing in The American, Marc Busch and Phil Levy are are skeptical of a WTO complaint against China's currency policies: ... the legal merits of the case are dubious. China’s exchange rate regime could be attacked as a subsidy scheme or as a way of frustrating market opening

Over at vox, Simon Evenett writes: The failure to conclude the Doha Round isn't the only drain on the credibility of the WTO and the rules-based trading system. Poor choices of dispute settlement cases are too. It appears that some are so besotted with the "power"

From Global Trade Watch: The Trade Data Center that we launched last week contains so many data products that they can almost be lost in a blur. Right now I’d like to take some time to zoom in and profile the most exciting new data product – the overhauled Trade

I have found the recent discussions of "currency wars" hard to follow.  There seems to be a fear that many governments are taking actions which cause their currency to decline in value, in the interest of pursuing competitive devaluations.  I'm not convinced.  It seems to me

This takes me back to the Japan  - Film case: South Korean lawmakers are finalising legislation that would restrict the opening and operation of large urban supermarkets – a potential blow to Tesco, which counts the country as its biggest overseas market. ... Leftwing South Korean politicians began targeting Tesco early this

Following up on this post, here's more on the issue of European companies working on high speed rail projects in the U.S., from the Palm Beach Post: U.S. Rep. Ron Klein, D-Boca Raton, is going after one of the companies bidding to build a high-speed rail

Following up on my post about internet gambling bans and the dormant commerce clause, I noticed that Santa Clara University law prof Eric Goldman had this to say on the issue: I continue to believe that any state regulation of the Internet presumptively violates the dormant commerce clause, especially when