International Economic Law and Policy Blog (Page 122)

Sign in Subscribe

Joe Biden on Trump's Trade Policy

From a CNN interview with Chris Cuomo: BIDEN: With regard to North Korea, with China, I make it clear that we're going to move our defenses up, as we did before, and we're going to make sure we have the capacity to deal with it near

Guest Post: Brussels Demands Wood: A Precedent of Resorting to FTA Arbitration under the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement

This is a guest post from Iulianna Romanchyshyna, a Horizon 2020 Marie Curie Fellow and PhD candidate at the University of Passau (Germany) within the European Trade and Investment Partnership (EUTIP) project On 20th June 2019, the EU requested the establishment of an arbitration panel under the EU-Ukraine Association

Guest Post: “Terms of Reference” Analysis in US – Renewable Energy (DS510) Panel Report

This is a guest post by Vineet Hegde, a PhD researcher in International Law at the Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies at KU Leuven, Belgium. On 27 June 2019, the WTO panel in US — Certain Measures Relating to the Renewable Energy Sector issued its report and found eleven US

Call for Submissions: Indian Journal of International Economic Law

This is from editors of the Indian Journal of International Economic Law (IJIEL) from the National Law School of India University in Bangalore: The Indian Journal of International Economic Law (IJIEL) is now accepting submissions for its twelfth volume (Volume 12). IJIEL is a student edited, peer reviewed annual journal,

Todd Tucker on the DS510 Panel Ruling

Todd Tucker of the Roosevelt Institute is not happy with yesterday's WTO panel ruling against various U.S. states' local content requirements in the renewable energy sector. I responded on the Cato blog here, but I want to add a bit more in response to some of

The Democratic Candidates Debate Trade (A Tiny Bit)

In the debate on Wednesday involving 10 of the 20 Democratic candidates, trade barely came up. Given how much activity, shall we say, there has been on trade under the Trump administration, that was a bit of a surprise. Last night, though, in the debate involving the other 10 candidates,

Guest Post: The Impending Demise of the WTO Appellate Body: From Centrepiece to Historical Relic?

This is a guest post from Markus Wagner of the University of Wollongong: It is very unlikely that the ongoing G-20 summit will resolve the political dispute between China and the US over their bilateral trade relationship and the dispute over the future direction of the international trading system.

The Origins of the "Cogent Reasons" Approach to the Precedential Value of Appellate Body Reports

The United States has made it clear that it objects to the Appellate Body's view that a panel must follow a prior Appellate Body interpretation unless the panel has “cogent reasons” for departing from that interpretation. One of the longer U.S. explanations of its position is here.

NAFTA vs. USMCA vs. Something Else

Here is a comment from Ambassador Lighthizer in response to a question from Congressman Panetta at last week's House Ways and Means Committee hearing (starts at 3:23:09), on the choice between NAFTA or USMCA: I think we have clearly made an enormous, probably enormous, improvement in

China NME case suspended

Since no one else has raised it yet on this blog, I'll note that the WTO Panel hearing China's case against the EU regarding the use of a non-market economy methodology in anti-dumping cases suspended its work on 14 June (DS516/13). Such suspensions