International Economic Law and Policy Blog
  • Home
  • About
  • WorldTradeLaw.net
Sign in Subscribe

Ukraine-AD Measures on Ammonium Nitrate - Can below-cost input prices be rejected?

I just spent an hour looking at the Appellate Body's decision in this case, which relates to Ukraine's rejection of natural gas prices in Russia for the purpose of calculating exporters' costs of production. The Appellate Body upheld the Panel's ruling that Ukraine
Jesse Kreier 04 Oct 2019 2 min read

A $7.5 Billion Ammunition from the WTO?

At long last, the Article 22.6 Report of the Arbitrator on the Boeing-Airbus dispute is out.  Note that this dispute concerns an original dispute in which the United States (on behalf of Boeing) sued the European Union for the latter’s subsidies on Airbus. Another report in a parallel
Sungjoon Cho 02 Oct 2019 2 min read

Question from the U.S.: Why has the Appellate Body felt free to depart from what Members agreed to?

This is from the U.S. statement at Monday's DSB meeting: Indeed, for several months, both within the Informal Process and outside, the United States has actively sought engagement from Members on what we believe to be a fundamental issue. That is, how have we come to this
Simon Lester 02 Oct 2019 1 min read

Guest Post: A Carbon Border Tax or A Climate Tariff?

This is a guest post from Reinhard Quick, Professor for International Economic Law, Saarland University, Dr. iur. (University of Mannheim), LL.M (University of Michigan) The political guidelines for the next European Commission (2019-2024) are a victory for the proponents of the so-called "Border Carbon Adjustment" (BCA). The
Simon Lester 02 Oct 2019 7 min read

The SIEL–Hart Prize

This is from Hart Publishing: SUBMISSIONS FOR THE SIEL-HART PRIZE IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW ARE NOW OPEN! The SIEL–Hart Prize is awarded every two years to an outstanding unpublished manuscript by an early career scholar in the field of International Economic Law. The winner of the SIEL–Hart Prize
Simon Lester 02 Oct 2019 1 min read

A Serious Enforcement Mechanism Will Require Major Changes to USMCA’s Dispute Settlement Provisions

Jennifer A. Hillman is the senior fellow for trade and international political economy at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), specializing in U.S. trade policy, the law and politics of the World Trade Organization (WTO), international organizations, and Brexit. As debate over Congressional approval of the Trump Administration’s
Jennifer Hillman 30 Sep 2019 13 min read

A Few Thoughts on the Role of the WTO/AB Secretariats in WTO Disputes

Following-up on Joost's post about his new paper with Krzysztof Pelc on the role of the WTO and Appellate Body Secretariats in WTO disputes, I wanted to offer some brief thoughts. Here's the first one: More seriously, I sort of agree with them, in the sense
Simon Lester 29 Sep 2019 4 min read

Guest Post: GAFA’s Global Investment Tribunal: Is it Going to Stay? Call for a research partner

This is from Marcin J. Menkes of the Warsaw School of Economics: Although none of the GAFA companies –  Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple –  or other major tech giant has taken the first step, publicly, to establish a world investment tribunal, the question to already ask, is whether such an arbitration tribunal
Simon Lester 29 Sep 2019 3 min read

A Special Event: Judicial Conference for U.S. Trade Law To be Held on November 18, 2019 in DC

Judicial Conference for U.S. Trade Law To be Held on November 18, 2019 in DC Steve Charnovitz The United States Court of International Trade has just announced the agenda for its 20th Judicial Conference to be held on November 18, 2019 in Washington, DC.  The judicial conference is an
Charnovitz 27 Sep 2019 1 min read

The Role of the Secretariat in WTO Dispute Settlement (and the AB Crisis)

In order to save independent, two-tiered and binding WTO dispute settlement, US critiques of AB “overreach” must be taken seriously, even if one is not fully convinced by such critiques. If the AB has, indeed, “overreached”, who is actually behind it, and most importantly, how might one “correct the course”
Joost Pauwelyn 26 Sep 2019 3 min read

About

International Economic Law and Policy Blog

International Economic Law and Policy Blog

Expert commentary on the law, politics and economics of international trade and investment

Sign up for email notifications

[email protected]
Subscribe

Featured

Is There No Going Back on Trade? What Is the Path Forward? A Response to Lighthizer

Former U.S. Trade Rep. Bob Lighthizer has a new essay in Foreign Affairs, and I have some thoughts. I'm going to start with his brief big picture points on the direction of U.S. trade policy, and then go through a couple of the specific concepts he emphasizes.
27 Apr 2026 6 min read

The Section 301 Excess Capacity Investigation Needs Less Madness, More Method

Shortly after the Supreme Court ruled President Trump’s emergency tariffs under IEEPA  unconstitutional, the administration scrambled to rebuild its tariff wall. While the announcement of Section 122 tariffs immediately following the ruling will provide a temporary patch, the U.S. Trade Representative’s office quickly began to utilize another
24 Apr 2026 6 min read

War Tariffs

This is a co-authored post by Kathleen Claussen and Tim Meyer. Last week, President Trump announced that the United States would be imposing new tariffs of 50 percent of the value of any product coming from any country that sells weapons or provides military aid to Iran. Some commentators questioned
14 Apr 2026 5 min read

USMCA Review and Extension Predictions

When the idea of an expiration clause was suggested during the NAFTA renegotiation, I was against it from the start, and Inu and I wrote a pretty critical piece about it at the time. A review is great, we said, let's definitely have reviews, and there are plenty of ways to do that.
08 Apr 2026 5 min read

The Section 301 Surge Continues: Investigating the Adoption/Enforcement/Administration of Forced Labor Import Bans

This Section 301 investigation intends to pressure all sixty named trade partners (even, inexplicably, including Canada and Mexico) to adopt similar enforcement procedures. This announcement is highly problematic for the four reasons I address below.
16 Mar 2026 4 min read

Topics

2008 Presidential Election

25 posts

2012 Republican Primary

6 posts

2020 Democratic Primary

22 posts

2020 Presidential Campaign

6 posts

2024 Presidential Campaign

9 posts

2024 Republican Primary

9 posts

Announcements

27 posts

Appellate Body

72 posts

CAFTA

5 posts

CETA

8 posts

Currency Disputes

57 posts

Development

23 posts

Digital Trade

59 posts

Domestic Trade Powers

10 posts

Dormant Commerce Clause

3 posts

DSU 25 Interim Appeals

43 posts

DSU Article 11

13 posts

Economic Integration

8 posts

Economic Statecraft

10 posts

EU-UK Trade Negotiation

5 posts

Exceptions

19 posts

Exchange Rates

6 posts

Export Restrictions

13 posts

Food Aid

5 posts

Foreign Investment

21 posts

FTA Negotiations

13 posts

FTAs - General

22 posts

Gambling Dispute

52 posts

Global Governance

9 posts

Globalization

13 posts

Government Procurement

5 posts

Green Steel Deal

14 posts

IEEPA

9 posts

IEL in Domestic Courts

20 posts

Indo-Pacific Economic Framework

5 posts

Industrial Policy

19 posts

Investor-State Arbitration

93 posts

Jamieson Greer

17 posts

Katherine Tai

66 posts

NAFTA

19 posts

NAFTA Chapter 11

15 posts

NAFTA Chapter 19

5 posts

National Security

38 posts

Non Appeal Pact

3 posts

Non-Discrimination Standards

60 posts

Non-Market Economies

6 posts

Non-Violation Nullification or Impairment

19 posts

Precedent

25 posts

Public Views of Trade

9 posts

Rare Earths

1 post

Robert Lighthizer

18 posts

Russia Trade Sanctions

17 posts

Sanctions

15 posts

Section 301

3 posts

Sovereignty

9 posts

Speech

1 post

SPS/TBT

5 posts

Standards of Review

7 posts

State Enterprises

7 posts

Sub-National Trade Issues

5 posts

Subsidies

83 posts

Tariffs

3 posts

Terms of Trade Manipulation

6 posts

Trade Agreements

21 posts

Trade and Competition

14 posts

Trade and Development

21 posts

Trade and Environment

117 posts

Trade and Health

20 posts

Trade and Human Rights

9 posts

Trade and Income Inequality

1 post

Trade and Intellectual Property

26 posts

Trade and Labor

25 posts

Trade and Peace

4 posts

Trade and Security

35 posts

Trade and the Stock Market

2 posts

Trade Balance

11 posts

Trade in Everything

65 posts

Trade in Services

21 posts

Trade Law and International Law

10 posts

Trade Preferences/GSP

23 posts

Trade Remedies

63 posts

Trans Pacific Partnership

8 posts

Trump Administration

53 posts

U.S. Trade Policy

32 posts

U.S. Trade Politics

60 posts

US-China Trade Relations

26 posts

USMCA

19 posts

USMCA Dispute Settlement

33 posts

USMCA Sunset/Review Clause

19 posts

USTR

16 posts

WTO - General

25 posts

WTO Accessions

8 posts

WTO Disputes

175 posts

WTO DS Reform

13 posts

WTO Jurisprudence

28 posts

WTO Negotiations

30 posts
Powered by Ghost