By Anthea Roberts and Taylor St. John  On 17 July 2019, South Africa made its submission to UNCITRAL on investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) reform in which it seeks a “paradigm-shift” in investment law. In keeping with our description of South Africa as a “widener” in the UNCITRAL debates, the

I mentioned a possible U.S.-Japan trade deal here, described a couple weeks ago as an "agreement in principle". Things seem to have progressed a bit, with the Trump administration just issuing the following "Presidential Message to Congress Regarding the Notification of Initiation of United States–

This is a guest post from Gabriela Sánchez of the Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá Last September 3rd, the Permanent Court of Arbitration issued the Final Award on the case Michael Ballantine and Lisa Ballantine v. Dominican Republic. The case was governed under UNCITRAL (2010) arbitral rules and under the

One of the issues raised by the United States in its critique of the Appellate Body is the role of precedent. How much weight should be given to past cases? Is the Appellate Body being too deferential to its prior rulings? Is there a difference between the "cogent reasons&

The US first written submission in the Section 301 case (DS543) is an eye-opening read. To me, the ingenious arguments advanced by the USTR, no matter how far-fetched they may seem in places, raise some interesting questions and teach a valuable lesson about WTO law. I. A brief analysis of

Dani Rodrik has a new paper up at NBER, entitled "Putting Global Governance In Its Place." Two things jumped out at me. First, it surprised me that in discussing when regulatory standards are protectionist, he seems unaware of the national treatment principle: Unlike in the case of tariffs

This is from the Journal Committee at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National University, Lucknow, in collaboration with Centre for Trade and Investment Law, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade: The Journal Committee at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National University, Lucknow, in collaboration with Centre for Trade and Investment Law, Indian Institute

This is a guest post from Anna Marhold, Assistant Professor at the Institute of Public Law and the Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies at Leiden University, based on her article, "Externalising Europe’s energy policy in EU Free Trade Agreements: A cognitive dissonance between promoting sustainable development and

USTR has posted its first written submission in the DS543 case, which is China's complaint against the U.S. Section 301 measures. Among other things, there is a GATT Article XX(a) public morals argument. I'll let readers be the judge of all this. I wanted