International Economic Law and Policy Blog (Page 65)

International Economic Law and Policy Blog

Sign in Subscribe

How Did the U.S. Set Tariffs When Unconstrained by Trade Agreements?

Here's an excerpt from a very interesting new paper by Doug Irwin and Anson Soderbery: What objective is a government trying to achieve in setting import tariffs? ... what factors would drive government behavior in the absence of such agreements when countries have complete autonomy in setting tariff rates?

Guest Post: New Book on Energy in International Trade Law

This is a guest post post from Anna Marhold, Assistant Professor at Leiden Law SchoolEnergy in International Trade Law: Concepts, Regulation and Changing Markets (Cambridge University Press 2021) by Anna Marhold (Leiden Law School) Against the backdrop of energy markets that have radically changed in recent decades, this book offers

Commerce Secretary Raimondo on Section 232 Steel and Aluminum Tariffs

If any doubts remained six months into the Biden Administration that the Administration would be any less protectionist or “Buy American” oriented than its predecessor, they were largely laid to rest by recent comments from Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo in an interview with Bloomberg News *[1] (reported in World Trade

New World Trade Review Written/Video Debate on Carbon Border Adjustments

Many of you know Mona Paulsen as the Queen of Trade Law Archival Research, but she is also a scholarly tech innovator, having convinced the stodgy folks at Cambridge University Press to do a video discussion for a World Trade Review written debate series on carbon border adjustments. In this

Guest Post: Will the EU CBAM Cover More Than What You Think? Complex Goods, System Boundaries, and Circumvention Under the Commission’s CBAM Proposal

This is a guest post from trade lawyers Cándido García Molyneux & Paul Mertenskötter: On July 14, the European Commission presented its legislative proposal for a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (“CBAM”). This long-anticipated tool is intended to make importers pay for the greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions embedded in the covered

The Battle of Ben & Jerry's-WTO Law as a New Front

One week ago, global ice cream maker Ben & Jerry's announced that the firm would no longer allow products to be sold under its brand in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OTP). Israel's continuing occupation of these territories is almost universally considered a violation of international law-except

Per Capita Emissions vs. Manufacturing Emissions: Why Not Do Both?

In the Hindustan Times, trade lawyer RV Anuradha has an op-ed entitled "EU’s CBAM, US Carbon Tax undermine international climate and trade laws." What particularly interested me was the description of an alternative focus for climate change mitigation efforts. Whereas the EU and U.S. are emphasizing

The Beginning, End, and Imminence of Invoking Essential Security at the WTO

With the release of the latest US submission in United States-Origin Marking Requirement (DS597), it is worth thinking about one of the open questions of the GATT security exceptions in today’s climate – what does it mean to take action “in time of” an emergency in international relations? Security exceptions

RCEP dispute settlement - Some observations

As a former WTO lawyer, I am always interested in comparing WTO procedures to those of other trade agreements. I have recently found myself dabbling in RCEP’s dispute settlement provisions. While this is yesterday’s news, perhaps some readers who have not studied the RCEP might be interested in

Guest Post: Making the Rules of the Game with Prudence – Analysis of the EU’s CBAM Proposal

This is a guest post from trade lawyer Bixuan Wu of the Hiways law firm: On July 14, the European Commission unveiled its ambitious “Fit for 55” package, which includes the long-awaited legislative proposal on Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). The CBAM is the first climate measure that has potential