At the risk of my posts on this blog turning into Dani Rodrik comments exclusively, I have a comment on a short post he did on globalization and income inequality.  He refers to a Wall Street Journal article called "Globalization's Gains Come with a Price," and

Today's FT reports that there is a resolution of Indonesia's concerns regarding sharing virus samples and access to virus vaccines: The language of the World Health Assembly draft resolution is vague. It says a working group of the WHO, the UN’s health agency, will develop

A Reuters story today is titled, "Blair says coming weeks are make-or-break for WTO."  Blair is quoted as saying: "The reality is that if we don't get ... the headline agreement in the next two to three weeks then we won't do

As we discuss standards of review, and Article XVII:2 of the Anti-DUmping Agreement, we often refer to the U.S. administrative law case, Chevron.  The following article seems to suggest that importing an unrefined Chevron into international trade law may exceed Chevron's domestic force. "Chevron&

One of the latest areas of contention in the Doha round is India's concern that its citizens cannot obtain enough U.S. visas to provide GATS authorized services in the U.S.  See Minister Kamal Nath's statement. India has raised the issue of visas in negotiations,

The full text of the Section 301 currency petition is available here.  The  legal arguments start here.  Here are some excerpts (based on an OCR conversion of a scanned document -- hopefully the text came through OK, but there may be occasional typos): SCM Agreement Article 1/3.1(a) (prohibited

Forty-two members of Congress have submitted a Section 301 petition in relation to Chinese and Japanese currency valuation.  According to the press release: The petition, filed under section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, calls on the United States Trade Representative to take strong action to end China’

See Claude Barfield's article explaining the conflicting spins being put on the bipartisan trade compromise on FTAs and labor.

Lorand Bartels has a draft paper in which he argues that the EU's new GSP+ arrangement is not consistent with WTO rules.  He explains: Under this arrangement, additional tariff preferences (normally duty free treatment), were made available to developing countries committing to ratify and implement a list of

See the nice post by Peter Spiro at Opinio Juris.