International Economic Law and Policy Blog (Page 345)

International Economic Law and Policy Blog

Sign in Subscribe

Investor-State in the CETA

Including investor-state in the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada and the EU would, in my view, be a big deal in a number of ways (including the number of investments covered): A controversial NAFTA provision that allows corporations to seek compensation from governments is likely to be included

The KORUS FTA U.S. Auto Quota and GATT Article XXIV

This is from the White House fact sheet on the KORUS FTA: Automotive Safety Standards: Safety standards have effectively operated as a non-tariff barrier to U.S. auto exports. The 2010 supplemental agreement announced today allows for 25,000 cars per U.S. automaker – or almost four times the number

Investor-State, the TPP, and the Philip Morris BIT Claim

Is the BIT investment claim by Philip Morris against Uruguay going to make it difficult to get investor-state in the TPP? From an NZ online publication: The Greens have stepped up their attack on a planned trans-Pacific free trade zone after tobacco giant Philip Morris called for the right to

Could an FTA Hurt Imports?

I'm not sure I understand this article from the Philadelphia Inquirer: The 150,000 shiny new Hyundai and Kia cars expected to arrive annually through the Port of Philadelphia will not be hurt by a proposed free-trade agreement between the Obama administration and South Korea, officials said. Since

Expanding Investor-State?

Investor-state dispute settlement has been heavily criticized by many people who are opposed to international trade and investment rules generally. Would making this kind of dispute settlement available to entities other than "investors" make it more palatable to the critics? This is from an article in Slate: One

House Ways and Meaning Hearing on Investment Protection

Congressional committee hearings are often interesting, but they are difficult to blog about. The Q & A is the best part, but an official transcript -- which is much more blog-friendly than typing things up as they go along -- doesn't come out for a while. So, that&

The End of Anti-Dumping in Brazil

Just temporarily, I assume: Brazil froze all investigations of dumping practices by other countries after a presidential decree in October prohibited the tax agency from sharing information, Trade Minister Miguel Jorge said. About 70 probes cannot be completed without data such as the amount of goods imported and the price

LSE post in International Economic Law

For those who don't receive these things via the normal channels, it might be helpful to circulate this announcement of an additional post in International Economic Law via this blog. With thanks to Simon for the service - http://www.jobs.ac.uk/job/ABZ348/lectureships-in-law/ Lectureships in

More on Krugman's Job-Creating CVDs

Some further thoughts on Paul Krugman's suggestion that "[a] countervailing duty on Chinese exports would be job-creating." First off, I don't think he had in mind countervailing duties imposed pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930. I think he just meant "slap a

China's Appeal in the U.S. - AD/CVD on Chinese Products Dispute

China's appeal in the U.S. - AD/CVD on Chinese Products (DS379) dispute is here: http://www.worldtradelaw.net/na/ds379-6(na).pdf Some key issues in the appeal: Double Remedies This is the one I blogged about here. (In the comments on that post, I mentioned