Simon Lester

So much happened in the trade policy world today. I'm going to mention four things. These are probably not the most important four, but they are the four that piqued my interest enough to blog about them. 1. In NAFTA, it looks like the sunset clause -- automatic

This is from Bloomberg: While a U.S. proposal to increase tariffs on cars imported from Mexico that don’t meet stricter new content rules was a sticking point as recently as last week, that issue appeared to be resolved by Thursday. The U.S. agreed to keep the 2.

This is a guest post from trade lawyer Adarsh Ramanujan In this part, I will cover the point where the Complainants went wrong, regarding Article 16.1. This provision states – “The owner of a registered trademark shall have the exclusive right to prevent all third parties not having the owner’

This is a guest post from trade lawyer Adarsh Ramanujan As a practitioner in international trade law, I have always loved the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) Reports (the Appellate Body Reports more than the Panel Reports, to be honest). They are structured and well-written, though unnecessarily lengthy at times.

This is a guest post from Bashar H. Malkawi, Dean and Professor of Law, University of Sharjah In recent years, national movements against globalization and free trade have reached a critical mass and have resulted in the election of new political leaders who want to stop or even reverse globalization

Brett Fortnam of Inside U.S. Trade reports the following: The U.S. and Mexico have agreed to subject autos that do not meet a modernized North American Free Trade Agreement rule of origin to a 2.5 percent tariff if they are made at an existing manufacturing facility, industry

This is from today's Indonesia - Iron or Steel Safeguards Appellate Body report: 5.60. In light of the above, we consider that, in order to constitute one of the "measures provided for in Article XIX", a measure must present certain constituent features, absent which it

This is something from the EU's recent WTO modernization proposals: Counter-notifications , i.e. notifications made by a Member on behalf of another, are a potentially powerful instrument available in various agreements. They are, however, hardly used, partly because preparing them requires a significant amount of research and intelligence.

Following up on Dani Rodrik's FT op-ed from the other day, economist Robert Wade adds the following in a letter to the FT: [Rodrik] says that “when the US and Europe complain that China is infringing ‘global norms and rules’, they forget their own economic history. China’s

This is from Dani Rodrik in the FT: How will the world trade regime handle a large, increasingly powerful country such as China that apparently plays globalisation by different rules? This is the question that keeps US and European policymakers awake at night. The fever runs highest in the US,