Sign in Subscribe

Simon Lester

Simon Lester

Co-founder of WorldTradeLaw.net and China Trade Monitor. Non-resident fellow at the Baker Institute.

http://simonlester.com

Another Tobacco Investment Treaty Claim

Via a John Boscariol tweet, I see that there is a new tobacco regulation investment treaty claim in the works: INTERNATIONAL tobacco giant Philip Morris will launch legal action today aimed at forcing the Gillard government to back down on its plain-packaging legislation or face a compensation bill of

What Aspect of a Measure Should be Considered under the GATT Article XX Sub-Paragraphs? Some Criticism

In three comments on the last post, the Appellate Body's new approach to what aspect of a measure should be considered under the GATT Article XX sub-paragraphs is getting heavily criticized. In this post, I'm going to support some of that criticism, but then come

What Aspect of a Measure Should be Considered under the GATT Article XX Sub-Paragraphs? (Follow-up)

Back in 2007, I posted the following: In its first decision, U.S. - Gasoline, the Appellate Body famously (relatively speaking) said: One problem with the [panel's] reasoning ... is that the Panel asked itself whether the "less favourable treatment" of imported gasoline was "primarily aimed at&

Cigarette Package Labelling, in Australia and the U.S.

If you'll be in London on June 29, Andrew Mitchell will be talking about Australia's plain packaging for cigarette legislation at the UCL's WTO Scholars' Forum: Next month the Australian Government will introduce legislation to require the plain packaging of tobacco products by

Combating Climate Change through Investment Arbitration

Can investment treaties be used to force governments to follow through on their climate change plans? From a new paper: In addition to the general non-commercial risks that may affect any foreign direct investment, low-carbon investments face specific risks related to the mechanisms of public support that states

Investment Treaties and International Rights

A few posts ago, I asked: Of all the individuals, groups and other entities that are out there in the world, why do only "foreign investors" have access to this special international remedy? In the comments to my post, Mark Kantor said: Your question "why do only

Investor-State after the Australian Policy Change

In this paper, Luke Nottage is concerned that Australia's recent policy change with respect to investor-state might lead to a decline in investor-state provisions all around Asia. Here's the abstract: Treaty-based investor-state arbitration (ISA) has gradually become a more established part of

Understanding PPMs at the WTO

In the Peter Fitzgerald paper mentioned in the last post, I saw a reference to this sentence in "Understanding the WTO": The WTO agreements are interpreted to say ... [that] trade restrictions cannot be imposed on a product purely because of the way it has been produced. See p.

The Seal Products Dispute and a Public Morals Defense

In a new paper, Peter Fitzgerald is skeptical of a GATT Article XX(a) "public morals" defense being successfully invoked by the EU as a justification for its seal products ban. Here's a key excerpt: Moreover, since import prohibitions are among the most trade disruptive measures

Dictionaries and Legal Interpretation

Speaking of the Appellate Body, which is known for (among other things) its use of dictionaries, here's an interesting NY Times piece on the U.S. Supreme Court's increasing use of dictionaries: In a decision last week in a patent case, Chief Justice John G. Roberts