Simon Lester

This is from a submission by a number of WTO Members who are skeptical of allowing non-violation and situation complaints -- through the removal of the current moratorium on those complaints -- under the TRIPS Agreement: Non-violation and situation complaints are unnecessary to protect any balance of rights and obligations

This is from Fredrik Erixon of Brussels think tank ECIPE: Thirdly, it is difficult to find economic justifications to put copyright concerns in the top league of priorities. Copyrights are already much longer than is economically motivated. There is not an efficient system for global registration and transfers of copyrights;

I wish there were a lot less talk of the TPP leading to massive job losses or job gains, and instead people said more sensible things like this, from Ted Moran: But economists are taught—as a matter of theory—that trade agreements cannot be expected to create a greater

We discussed what Australia's Productivity Commission thought of ISDS back here.  Now they have something more to say, but I couldn't do anywhere near as good a job explaining it as Esme Shirlow did over at the Kluwer Arbitration Blog.  Here's an excerpt, but

I've always assumed that when you have an international investment treaty, which sets out obligations that states have to follow (and are subject to legal claims when they do not), this is public international law.  That is the case even if the "judges" hearing the claim

People keep asking me what I think of the TPP.  Given that, aside from a few leaks, I haven't seen the text, I'm a little unsure how to answer.  It kind of depends what's in it.  Nonetheless, I offered some preliminary thoughts here.  An

I wanted to mention two new books on WTO law.  The first I've been reading; the second is in the mail and I'll read it soon. The one I've been reading is A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO: The Development

This is a guest post from Geneva trade lawyer Adarsh Ramanujan:“Rebuttable” presumption of Article 2.2 inconsistency arising from Article 5.1 inconsistency? Continuing from my earlier post on the AB Report on India – Agricultural Products, I found another finding of the AB to be an interesting one – this

This is a guest post from Geneva trade lawyer Adarsh Ramanujan:‘Interpretation’ of the scientific standards? Thoughts about India – Agricultural Products I finally got around to reading the AB Report released earlier in June in the India – Agricultural Products. I found one of the claims raised by India to be

From ELSA: ELSA International invites proposals from prospective case authors to write the Moot Court Case for the 14th edition of the ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law. EMC2 is a simulated hearing of a World Trade Organization dispute settlement panel. Teams of interested students from all over the