. . . could fill an international law library. See his statement against "pooling sovereignty" in the Washington Examiner (is that a newspaper?). This seems to be a general position against all international law, including presumably trade, investment, IP, etc. To add insult to ignorance, he refers to President Obama as a post-American president. Googling this phrase, I see that he is not the first, but in my naivete I find this shockingly uncivil coming from someone who actually has held responsibility, not to mention the scurrilous innuendo regarding Obama's American-ness.
Yes, I understand that this is not central to our topic, that this is not new for Bolton, and that it is more political than our usual commentary. However, Bolton's views challenge U.S. participation in all international law, including international economic law. I promise a doctrinal international economic law post very soon.
