NAFTA Chapter 19

Last year, a NAFTA Chapter 19 panel found that zeroing violates U.S. law.  See this post for details.  The panel thus remanded the matter back to Commerce to re-calculate the dumping margins without zeroing. Commerce did take some action, but the respondents felt that it was insufficient, and went

... as I was in the last post, a number of prior NAFTA Chapter 19 panels have addressed the permissibility of zeroing under U.S. law.  In yesterday's panel report in LWR Pipe and Tube, the panel addressed a different question:  Is the Department of Commerce allowed to stop

As mentioned a little while ago, a NAFTA Chapter 19 panel recently found that zeroing violates U.S. law.  Here's a brief rundown of the majority opinion, and a little bit about the dissent. The issue addressed by the panel majority was:  "Whether Commerce’s Application of

It's not just the WTO.  Last week, a NAFTA Chapter 19 tribunal that was considering a Department of Commerce AD ruling found zeroing to be impermissible: In sum, on the issue of the permissibility of zeroing, the Panel remands the matter back to Commerce to re-calculate Mittal’s