Simon Lester

The U.S. Article 21.5 panel request in EC - Aircraft is here.  A key issue will be subsidies to the Airbus A350, a new model.  Recall that the panel excluded these subsidies from the original dispute: 7.314 Thus, in conclusion, after carefully reviewing the evidence and arguments

Last week, President Obama announced that he would suspend Argentina's GSP benefits, due to an alleged failure to enforce two arbitration awards: Having considered the factors set forth in section 502(b)(2)(E) of the 1974 Act, I have determined pursuant to section 502(d) that it

From a recent NY Times article about WTO financial services rules: Back in the 1990s, when many in Washington — and virtually everyone on Wall Street — embraced the deregulation that helped lead to the recent crisis, a vast majority of W.T.O. nations made varying commitments to what’s called

Here are some dates for those waiting for the Appellate Body to explain key provisions of the TBT Agreement: - The Clove Cigarettes report will be circulated on schedule by April 4. - The Appellate Body will need a little more than the usual 90 days in the Tuna-Dolphin case,

From paras. 117-118 of the the U.S. appellant submission in U.S. - COOL, here are two views of the scope of TBT 2.2.  First, the view the U.S. doesn't like: ... In other words, the Panel finds that because the COOL measure does not contribute

Long-time reader Daniel Vazquez offers some insights on the Mexico-Brazil auto trade dispute discussed by the WSJ a little while back: After reading this article there are several issues that come to mind. First, why did Mexico give up the fight in the first round? It is understood that the

I feel like I'm in a mid-1990s time warp.  From Xinhua: China's Ministry of Commerce imposed five-year anti-dumping duties of 16.2 to 28.8 percent on photographic paper and paperboard from the United States, the European Union and Japan in a final ruling on Thursday.

Here's former U.S. trade negotiator Clyde Prestowitz writing in the FT: As the director of President Reagan’s strike force against unfair trade, I targeted Airbus subsidies and a variety of Japanese trade barriers. Although we achieved positive results in specific cases, in a broader sense we

Two further thoughts on Australia's plain packaging legislation occurred to me. First, what if Australia had simply banned cigarettes?  Are there differences in relation to trademark protection between (1) a product ban and (2) a narrower ban on using trademarks on the product? Second, let's say

There are at least five legal proceedings going on right now related to government regulation of cigarette packaging.  They are based on a variety of different, but sometimes overlapping, legal claims.  It's difficult to characterize some of these claims, but I am going to give it a shot: