Simon Lester

This is from the NY Times: The contentious negotiations over the fate of the North American Free Trade Agreement have veered into one of the world’s most pressing health issues: fighting obesity. Urged on by big American food and soft-drink companies, the Trump administration is using the trade

The U.S. submissions in the Russia - Traffic in Transit case are now available here. Here's an excerpt from the third party oral statement: III. The Text of Article XXI, in its Context, Establishes That the Exception Is Self-Judging 11. Article XXI of the GATT 1994, in

A clarification of the scope of the GATT Article XXI security exception may come sooner than expected, as Russia has invoked Article XXI(b)(iii) in the Russia - Traffic in Transit (DS512) dispute. The EU's third party submissions are now online: Third party written submission and third party

In my last post, I highlighted the comments of John Leddy, a U.S. delegate to the GATT negotiations, on the meaning and scope of the GATT security exception. But you probably noticed that the version under discussion as part of the New York draft does not have the crucial

In the New York draft of the GATT, the security exception was in Article 37, and was combined with the exceptions that are now part of GATT Article XX. Here's what the security exception looked like in this draft: SECTION H. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS Article 37 General exceptions to

Presidential proclamations here and here. Canada and Mexico exempt for now. Here is the situation for other countries (from the steel proclamation): 9.  In adopting this tariff, I recognize that our Nation has important security relationships with some countries whose exports of steel articles to the United States weaken our

In anticipation of possible U.S. tariffs/quotas on steel/aluminum imports under Section 232, citing national security, I'm going to run through the possible WTO claims against such measures. Let's hope everyone can talk the Trump administration out of this, but if not, a WTO

This is a guest post from Dr. Szilárd Gáspár Szilágyi, a Postdoctoral Fellow at PluriCourts, University of Oslo These are exciting times for both investment law and EU law professionals. The EU’s recent moves in international investment law have become the topic of much discussion, be it the conclusion

This is from Politico: But European Union officials are already planning retaliatory actions, targeting products from politically sensitive Republican-run states, including the imposition of tariffs on Harley-Davidsons made in Speaker Paul Ryan’s home state of Wisconsin; duties on bourbon made in Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s

If you are looking for a distraction from the general panic about Trump's possible steel/aluminum tariffs, take a look at this from Inside US Trade: Efforts to fix NAFTA’s state-to-state dispute settlement process have also progressed during this round, sources said. Mexico and Canada