International Economic Law and Policy Blog

Sign in Subscribe

Mona Paulsen

The Curious Case of US Self-Judging, Part 2

Last Friday, the United States appealed the US-Origin Marking Requirement (DS597) and the US-Steel and Aluminium Products (DS544,552, 556, 564) reports. With the appeal came news that the US would lead an effort to draft an authoritative interpretation of GATT Article XXI. This U.S. administration will want to

If I were an Appellate Body. Post 1.

At the close of December, 2 WTO panel reports were circulated. First, United States – Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products (DS544/552/556/564) on 9 December 2022. Second, United States-Origin Marking (DS597) on 21 December 2022. This post is in multiple parts. The first, If I were an

How could China respond to recent US export controls?

On October 3, 2022, the United States provided its latest notification list for all quantitative restrictions (the previous notification was in 2020). The notice does not include the recent export restrictions on AI and semiconductors to China, as part of a broader strategy for U.S. technology competition, formally announced

Friend-shoring

Friend-shoring. Secretary Yellen’s remarks of April 13, 2022 spoke of “friend-shoring” – a commitment to work with countries that “have strong adherence to a set of norms and values about how to operate in the global economy and about how to run the global economic system.” Friend-shoring is not new.

Questions about the 1982 Decision and Article XXI of the GATT

In 1982, the contracting parties adopted a Ministerial Declaration to take seriously the consideration of 'non-economic' trade measures. On 30 November 1982, the contracting parties adopted the Decision Concerning Article XXI of the General Agreement (the 1982 Decision) which set out some basic procedural guidelines for the application

The Beginning, End, and Imminence of Invoking Essential Security at the WTO

With the release of the latest US submission in United States-Origin Marking Requirement (DS597), it is worth thinking about one of the open questions of the GATT security exceptions in today’s climate – what does it mean to take action “in time of” an emergency in international relations? Security exceptions

Job Advert Stanford Law School Teaching Fellowship

STANFORD LAW SCHOOL seeks to hire a teaching fellow for the LLM Program in International Economic Law, Business & Policy. The appointment is for a two-year position with the possibility of a third year by mutual agreement, beginning In August 2020. The fellow will assume significant academic, advising and administrative

The historical references in the U.S. First Submission in United States-Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminum Products

The United States’ First Submission for United States-Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminum Products is out. Similar to its third-party submissions in the Russia-Traffic in Transit dispute, the United States argues the drafting history of the International Trade Organization (ITO) supports an understanding that Article XXI GATT is, and has

Federal Court of Canada hearing Canada's application to set aside Bilcon NAFTA award

For those that may have missed it, the NAFTA Bilcon v Canada dispute was back in the news this week. In 2015, the Claytons and Bilcon of Delaware, a US company, were awarded compensation for breaches of NAFTA Articles 1105 (fair and equitable treatment) and 1102 (national treatment). The dispute

A NAFTA proposal: fix the FET investment protection commitment*

With the NAFTA negotiations, investment lawyers, lawmakers, business groups, and civil society are waiting to see how Canada, Mexico, and the US will address the heated topic of investor-State arbitration, where an investor can claim compensation directly against a host state based on a treaty breach before an ad hoc