More on Judicial Review of AD/CVD Measures

In response to my post of the other day, Müslüm Yilmaz of the WTO (and also a commenter on the post) point me to this book:

Domestic Judicial Review of Trade Remedies: Experiences of the Most Active WTO Members

Trade remedies, namely anti-dumping, countervailing measures and safeguards, are one of the most controversial issues in today's global trading environment. When used, such measures effectively close the markets of the importing countries to competition from outside for a certain period of time. Exporters that are faced with such measures can either try to convince their government to bring a case against the government of the importing country in the WTO or to use, themselves, the judicial review mechanism of the importing country. This second path has been, until now, largely unexamined. Domestic Judicial Review of Trade Remedies is the first book of its kind to examine in detail how the judicial review process has functioned and considers the experiences in the domestic courts of the twenty-one WTO members that are the biggest users of trade remedies.

The book has the following chapters:

• 2 - Canada: high deference, stark reality
  pp 11-34
• By Andrew M. Lanouette, Christopher J. Kent

• 3 - United States: judicial review: a cornerstone of trade remedies practice
  pp 35-54
• By John D. McInerney, Michele D. Lynch
• 
  4 - Mexico: quasi-judicial review of trade remedy measures by NAFTA panels
  pp 55-82

• By Jorge Miranda, Juan Carlos Partida

• 5 - Colombia: a complex court system with the possibility of three instances
  pp 83-106
• By María Clara Lozano

• 6 - Brazil: the need for enhanced effectiveness
  pp 107-128
• By Rabih A. Nasser, Luciana B. Costa
• 
  7 - Argentina: a well-structured but unsuccessful judicial review system
  pp 129-152

• By Mercedes de Artaza
• 
  8 - Peru: a sophisticated but underused judicial review system
  pp 153-172

• By Luis Alberto León, María Antonieta Merino
• 
  9 - The European Union: an imperfect and time-consuming system
  pp 173-196

• By Edwin Vermulst, Juhi Sud

• 10 - Turkey: a judicial review system in need of change
  pp 197-220
• By Müslüm Yilmaz

• 11 - Israel: a comparative study of two models
  pp 221-246
• By Arie Reich, Gill Nadel

• 12 - South Africa: a complicated, unpredictable, long and costly judicial review system
  pp 247-268
• By Gustav Brink

• 13 - Pakistan: an evolving judicial review system
  pp 269-286
• By Faizullah Khilji, Mazhar Bangash

• 14 - India: a three-tier judicial review system
  pp 287-312
• By Madhurendra Nath Jha

• 15 - China: an untested theoretical possibility?
  pp 313-336
• By Gao Henry

• 16 - Korea: increasing attention and new challenges
  pp 337-360
• By Jaemin Lee

• 17 - Indonesia: a judicial review system in dire need of restructuring
  pp 361-378
• By Erry Bundjamin

• 18 - Australia: judicial review with merits review
  pp 379-398
• By Stephen Gageler

• 19 - Countries with insufficient judicial review activity
  pp 399-422

I don't know how far the authors went with the data collection I had in mind, but this book seems like a great place to start!