Todd Tucker refers to the current trade regime as a "pro-corporate global governance system." Is that a fair characterization? Aren't just as many corporations opposed to the system as are for it? There are winners and losers from every policy -- some corporations are hurt and some are helped.
Also, if it is an accurate description, is there anything wrong with that? Corporations employ workers, so if it is pro-corporate, isn't it also pro-worker?
And is "global governance" itself too strong? Are trade agreements powerful enough that they can be said to be "governing" things?
