The notice of appeal is here. Panama, the complainant, "won" the case, but ended up with a finding that did not achieve its goals, so it appealed.
This is potentially one of the most interesting GATS cases I've seen. It is sort of like the counterpart to many of the recent TBT cases, with a non-protectionist purpose having been offered, a de facto discrimination analysis carried out, and a finding of violation on narrow grounds that suggests the respondent could make the measure more restrictive and come into compliance.
